Agrawal, A. A. Macroevolution of plant defense strategies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 103–109 (2007).
Ehrlich, P. R. & Raven, P. H. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18, 586–608 (1964).
Hahn, P. G. & Maron, J. L. A framework for predicting intraspecific variation in plant defense. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 646–656 (2016).
Stamp, N. Out of the quagmire of plant defense hypotheses. Q. Rev. Biol. 78, 23–55 (2003).
Herms, D. A. & Mattson, W. J. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Q. Rev. Biol. 67, 283–335 (1992).
Pratt, J. D. & Mooney, K. A. Clinal adaptation and adaptive plasticity in Artemisia californica: implications for the response of a foundation species to predicted climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 2454–2466 (2013).
Woods, E. C., Hastings, A. P., Turley, N. E., Heard, S. B. & Agrawal, A. A. Adaptive geographical clines in the growth and defense of a native plant. Ecol. Monogr. 82, 149–168 (2012).
O’Neill, G. A., Aitken, S. N., King, J. N. & Alfaro, R. I. Geographic variation in resin canal defenses in seedlings from the Sitka spruce x white spruce introgression zone. Can. J. For. Res. 32, 390–400 (2002).
Anderson, J. T., Perera, N., Chowdhury, B. & Mitchell-Olds, T. Microgeographic patterns of genetic divergence and adaptation across environmental gradients in Boechera stricta (Brassicaceae). Am. Nat. 186, S60–S73 (2015).
Suárez-Vidal, E. et al. Drought stress modifies early effective resistance and induced chemical defences of Aleppo pine against a chewing insect herbivore. Environ. Exp. Bot. 162, 550–559 (2019).
Rigling, A., Bruhlhart, H., Braker, O. U., Forster, T. & Schweingruber, F. H. Effects of irrigation on diameter growth and vertical resin duct production in Pinus sylvestris L. on dry sites in the central Alps, Switzerland. For. Ecol. Manag. 175, 285–296 (2003).
Burghardt, K. T. Nutrient supply alters goldenrod’s induced response to herbivory. Funct. Ecol. 30, 1769–1778 (2016).
Raffa, K. F. et al. Cross-scale drivers of natural disturbances prone to anthropogenic amplification: the dynamics of bark beetle eruptions. BioScience 58, 501–517 (2008).
Thuiller, W., Lavorel, S., Araújo, M. B., Sykes, M. T. & Prentice, I. C. Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 8245–8250 (2005).
Kelly, A. E. & Goulden, M. L. Rapid shifts in plant distribution with recent climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 11823–11826 (2008).
Aitken, S. N., Yeaman, S., Holliday, J. A., Wang, T. & Curtis‐McLane, S. Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes for tree populations. Evol. Appl. 1, 95–111 (2008).
Franks, S. J., Weber, J. J. & Aitken, S. N. Evolutionary and plastic responses to climate change in terrestrial plant populations. Evol. Appl. 7, 123–139 (2014).
Alberto, F. J. et al. Potential for evolutionary responses to climate change–evidence from tree populations. Glob. change biol. 19, 1645–1661 (2013).
Hoffmann, A. A. & Sgro, C. M. Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature 470, 479 (2011).
Petit, R. J. & Hampe, A. Some evolutionary consequences of being a tree. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37, 187–214 (2006).
Valladares, F. et al. The effects of phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation on forecasts of species range shifts under climate change. Ecol. Lett. 17, 1351–1364 (2014).
Li, Y., Suontama, M., Burdon, R. D. & Dungey, H. S. Genotype by environment interactions in forest tree breeding: review of methodology and perspectives on research and application. Tree Genet. Genomes 13, 60 (2017).
Herms, D. A. & Mattson, W. J. Does reproduction compromise defense in woody plants? Forest Insect Guilds: Patterns of Interaction with Host Trees. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, General Technical Report NE-153, 35–46 (1991).
Agrawal, A. A. Current trends in the evolutionary ecology of plant defence. Funct. Ecol. 25, 420–432 (2011).
Agrawal, A. A., Conner, J. K. & Rasmann, S. Tradeoffs and negative correlations in evolutionary ecology in Evolution since Darwin: the first 150 years Vol. 150 (eds. Bell, M.A., Futuyma, D. J., Eanes, W. F., & Levinton, J. S.) 243–268 (Sinauer Associates, Inc, 2010).
Coley, P. D., Bryant, J. P. & Chapin, F. S. Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230, 895–899 (1985).
Endara, M. J. & Coley, P. D. The resource availability hypothesis revisited: a meta‐analysis. Funct. Ecol. 25, 389–398 (2011).
Sampedro, L., Moreira, X. & Zas, R. Costs of constitutive and herbivore‐induced chemical defences in pine trees emerge only under low nutrient availability. J. Ecol. 99, 818–827 (2011).
Abdala‐Roberts, L., Moreira, X., Cervera, J. C. & Parra‐Tabla, V. Light availability influences growth‐defense trade‐offs in big‐leaf mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King). Biotropica 46, 591–597 (2014).
Agrawal, A. A. A scale‐dependent framework for trade‐offs, syndromes, and specialization in organismal biology. Ecology 101, e02924 (2020).
Celedon, J. M. & Bohlmann, J. Oleoresin defenses in conifers: chemical diversity, terpene synthases and limitations of oleoresin defense under climate change. N. Phytol. 224, 1444–1463 (2019).
Franceschi, V. R., Krokene, P., Christiansen, E. & Krekling, T. Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. N. Phytol. 167, 353–376 (2005).
Ferrenberg, S., Kane, J. M. & Mitton, J. B. Resin duct characteristics associated with tree resistance to bark beetles across lodgepole and limber pines. Oecologia 174, 1283–1292 (2014).
Kane, J. M. & Kolb, T. E. Importance of resin ducts in reducing ponderosa pine mortality from bark beetle attack. Oecologia 164, 601–609 (2010).
Hood, S., Sala, A., Heyerdahl, E. K. & Boutin, M. Low-severity fire increases tree defense against bark beetle attacks. Ecology 96, 1846–1855 (2015).
Zhao, S. & Erbilgin, N. Larger resin ducts are linked to the survival of lodgepole pine trees during mountain pine beetle outbreak. Front. Plant. Sci. 10, 1459 (2019).
Fritts, H. Tree rings and climate. (Academic Press, 1976).
Hahn, P. G., Agrawal, A. A., Sussman, K. I. & Maron, J. L. Population variation, environmental gradients, and the evolutionary ecology of plant defense against herbivory. Am. Nat. 193, 20–34 (2018).
Zas, R. et al. Intraspecific variation of anatomical and chemical defensive traits in Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) as factors in susceptibility to the pinewood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus). Trees-struct. funct. 29, 663–673 (2015).
Vázquez-González, C., López-Goldar, X., Zas, R. & Sampedro, L. Neutral and climate-driven adaptive processes contribute to explain population variation in resin duct traits in a Mediterranean pine species. Front. Plant. Sci. 10, 01613 (2019).
Gaylord, M. L. et al. Drought predisposes pinon-juniper woodlands to insect attacks and mortality. N. Phytol. 198, 567–578 (2013).
Moreira, X., Zas, R., Solla, A. & Sampedro, L. Differentiation of persistent anatomical defensive structures is costly and determined by nutrient availability and genetic growth-defence constraints. Tree Physiol. 35, 112–123 (2015).
Lo, Y.-H., Blanco, J. A., Seely, B., Welham, C. & Kimmins, J. H. Relationships between climate and tree radial growth in interior British Columbia, Canada. For. Ecol. Manag. 259, 932–942 (2010).
Lebourgeois, F. Climatic signals in earlywood, latewood and total ring width of Corsican pine from western France. Ann. For. Sci. 57, 155–164 (2000).
Domec, J. C. & Gartner, B. L. How do water transport and water storage differ in coniferous earlywood and latewood? J. Exp. Bot. 53, 2369–2379 (2002).
Gindl, W., Grabner, M. & Wimmer, R. The influence of temperature on latewood lignin content in treeline Norway spruce compared with maximum density and ring width. Trees-struct. funct. 14, 409–414 (2000).
Wimmer, R. & Grabner, M. Effects of climate on vertical resin duct density and radial growth of Norway spruce Picea abies (L) Karst. Trees-struct. funct. 11, 271–276 (1997).
Wu, H. & Hu, Z. H. Comparative anatomy of resin ducts of the Pinaceae. Trees-struct. funct. 11, 135–143 (1997).
Rosner, S. & Hannrup, B. Resin canal traits relevant for constitutive resistance of Norway spruce against bark beetles: environmental and genetic variability. For. Ecol. Manag. 200, 77–87 (2004).
Westbrook, J. W. et al. Association genetics of oleoresin flow in loblolly pine: discovering genes and predicting phenotype for improved resistance to bark beetles and bioenergy potential. N. Phytol. 199, 89–100 (2013).
Saracino, A. et al. Climatic signal from Pinus leucodermis axial resin ducts: a tree-ring time series approach. Eur. J. For. Res. 136, 27–36 (2017).
Hood, S. & Sala, A. Ponderosa pine resin defenses and growth: metrics matter. Tree Physiol. 35, 1223–1235 (2015).
Klutsch, J. G. & Erbilgin, N. Dwarf mistletoe infection in jack pine alters growth–defense relationships. Tree Physiol. 38, 1538–1547 (2018).
Mason, C. J. et al. Anatomical defenses against bark beetles relate to degree of historical exposure between species and are allocated independently of chemical defenses within trees. Plant. Cell Environ. 42, 633–646 (2019).
Redmond, M. D., Davis, T. S., Ferrenberg, S. M. & Wion, A. P. Resource allocation trade-offs in a mast-seeding conifer: Piñon pine prioritizes reproduction over defense. AoB PLANTS 11(6), plz070 (2019).
Alía, R., Gil, L. & Pardos, J. Performance of 43 Pinus pinaster Ait. provenances on 5 locations in central Spain. Silvae Genet. 44, 75–80 (1995).
Abad Viñas, R., Caudullo, G., Oliveira, S. & de Rigo, D. Pinus pinaster in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats in European Atlas of Forest Tree Species (Publi. Off. EU, Luxemburg) e012d59 (2016).
Jaramillo-Correa, J.-P. et al. Molecular proxies for climate maladaptation in a long-lived tree (Pinus pinaster Aiton, Pinaceae). Genetics 199, 793–807 (2015).
Bucci, G. et al. Range‐wide phylogeography and gene zones in Pinus pinaster Ait. revealed by chloroplast microsatellite markers. Mol. Ecol. 16, 2137–2153 (2007).
Arrabal, C., Cortijo, M., de Simón, B. F., Vallejo, M. C. G. & Cadahía, E. Differentiation among five Spanish Pinus pinaster provenances based on its oleoresin terpenic composition. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 33, 1007–1016 (2005).
Correia, I. et al. Variations in growth, survival and carbon isotope composition (δ13C) among Pinus pinaster populations of different geographic origins. Tree Physiol. 28, 1545–1552 (2008).
Santos-del-Blanco, L., Climent, J., González-Martínez, S. & Pannell, J. Genetic differentiation for size at first reproduction through male versus female functions in the widespread Mediterranean tree Pinus pinaster. Ann. Bot. 110, 1449–1460 (2012).
Hengl, T. et al. SoilGrids1km—global soil information based on automated mapping. PLoS One 9, e105992 (2014).
Alía, R., Serrano, J. M. & Denis, J. Ensayos de procedencias de Pinus pinaster Ait. en el centro de España: resultados a la edad de 32 años. Invest. Agrar. Sist. Recur. For. 10, 333–354 (2001).
Holmes, R. L. Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating and measurement. Tree-Ring Bul. 43, 69–78 (1983).
Biondi, F. & Qeadan, F. A theory-driven approach to tree-ring standardization: defining the biological trend from expected basal area increment. Tree-Ring Res. 64, 81–97 (2008).
Gonzalo, J. Phytoclimatic analysis of the Spanish Peninsula: update and geostatistical analysis, PhD Thesis, University of Valladolid, Palencia, Spain, (2008).
Mitchell, T. D. & Jones, P. D. An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high resolution grids. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 693–712 (2005).
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 82 (2017).
Lenth, R. V. Least-squares means: the R package lsmeans. J. Stat. Softw. 69, 1–33 (2016).
Wickham, H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. (Springer, 2016).
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/ (2014).